History is now
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
History is now

Any fool can make history, but it takes a genius to write it. Oscar Wilde


You are not connected. Please login or register

The Pashley Pickle

2 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

1The Pashley Pickle Empty The Pashley Pickle Tue Mar 11, 2014 10:24 pm

Guest


Guest

1851 census Huddersfield
William Pashley 30 stone mason
wife Rhoda 25
son John 2
son Shelley 4 who died 3 March 1852 age 5

My problem is John as the death I have is 21 Nov 1858 9 months son of William stone mason.

Now Rhoda died 8 Jun 1854 so if baby John was only 9 months old in 1858 that's a problem  scratch 

William didn't remarry till 1860 and that was in Manchester.

Did he have another liaison or has there been a mistake somewhere?
If this is another John what happened to the first one?  

There's a birth in Huddersfield 1849 which would fit the one on the 1851 census and two JP Huddersfield deaths one in 1845 and the one in 1858.

2The Pashley Pickle Empty Re: The Pashley Pickle Wed Mar 12, 2014 9:47 am

SmallTownGirl



Only had time for a v.quick look, but from FS it seems that there are a LOT of Pashleys in Huddersfield.  William is a common name everywhere, but John less so (surprisingly - well, to me anyway), and stonemason not an uncommon job.

I know maths isn't always my strong point, but .... if John was 2 in 1851, then he simply can't be the one who died 7 years later age 9mths.  Have you looked for a 12yo John in 1861, with/without his father, perhaps?

Maybe the John's death you have is the son of a different William to the William that was married to Rhoda?  Or do you know it's the correct one from the address on the death cert?

Orf out [again] now.  Will look in later to see if any progress.

cheers
STG

3The Pashley Pickle Empty Re: The Pashley Pickle Wed Mar 12, 2014 10:02 am

Guest


Guest

Maths isn't my strong point either but what would make sense is if there was a mistake on the certificate and he was 9 years old not 9 months old  Idea 

If his was the birth in Jun 1849 then he would be 9 when he died in Nov 1858.  Address on the cert is Longroyd Bridge which was in the right area. Cause of death "congestion of the brain 2 days"

I haven't looked for him in 1861 on his lonesome but I will do for completeness.

His father was with new wife, 3 week old son William, daughter Alice 9 in Manchester 1861.
Plus a sister in law Matilda Vollar 21 which ties in with my other post about his wife's origins.  

 study

4The Pashley Pickle Empty Re: The Pashley Pickle Wed Mar 12, 2014 10:10 am

SmallTownGirl



I've just had a quick look on FMP and the John Pashley who was buried in Huddersfield in 1858 has a year of birth of 1849 ...

Says source of the info is parish records.

If FS has the same record, I'd be asking for a copy to see what's written in the age column.

Really do have to go out now!

STG

5The Pashley Pickle Empty Re: The Pashley Pickle Wed Mar 12, 2014 10:21 am

Guest


Guest

Ooh thanks STG so he was 9 then.

Catch you later  cheers 

6The Pashley Pickle Empty Re: The Pashley Pickle Wed Mar 12, 2014 2:48 pm

vron



you haven't mentioned but am assuming you know all about it - daughter alice is daughter of Rhoda and her christening in 1860 is online and gives longroyd bridge as address then.

7The Pashley Pickle Empty Re: The Pashley Pickle Wed Mar 12, 2014 3:01 pm

Guest


Guest

Yes Alice belonged to Rhoda but I hadn't realised till just now looking at the baptism that what has been transcribed as Rhoda "Cate" is the word late and I thought that meant "late Hinchliffe" for her name not late as in deceased  Embarassed 

8The Pashley Pickle Empty Re: The Pashley Pickle Wed Mar 12, 2014 3:18 pm

vron



well I read it as late for name hinchliffe not late deceased as well!

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Similar topics

-

» John Pashley

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum